Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command R+
Which is better in 2026?
Claude Haiku 4.5
83
Veltrix Score
vs
Command R+
78
Veltrix Score
Detailed Scores
Claude Haiku 4.5 — Scores
Coding80
Reasoning78
Creativity75
Speed95
Cost Efficiency92
Context: 200K tokens
API: $1 / $5 per 1M tokens
Command R+ — Scores
Coding76
Reasoning82
Creativity78
Speed78
Cost Efficiency74
Context: 128K tokens
API: $2.5 / $10 per 1M tokens
Key Differences
| Aspect | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| Veltrix Score | 83/100 | 78/100 |
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| API Cost (input/output per 1M) | $1 / $5 | $2.5 / $10 |
| Coding | 80/100 | 76/100 |
| Reasoning | 78/100 | 82/100 |
| Speed | 95/100 | 78/100 |
Best for — Claude Haiku 4.5
- +Code generation and review
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Best for — Command R+
- +Complex reasoning tasks
Analysis
Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command R+ are both popular choices in the llm space. Claude Haiku 4.5 currently leads with a Veltrix Score of 83 compared to 78 for Command R+.
In coding benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 takes the lead. For reasoning tasks, Command R+ performs stronger. For cost-conscious developers, Claude Haiku 4.5 offers better value per token.
This comparison is generated from live Veltrix ranking data. Scores are updated multiple times per week as new benchmarks and user data become available.
Need help choosing the right tools?
Get a free AI-powered audit of your website, or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tool updates and recommendations.