Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o4-mini
Which is better in 2026?
Claude Sonnet 4.6
90
Veltrix Score
vs
o4-mini
88
Veltrix Score
Detailed Scores
Claude Sonnet 4.6 — Scores
Coding92
Reasoning93
Creativity91
Speed88
Cost Efficiency82
Context: 1000K tokens
API: $3 / $15 per 1M tokens
o4-mini — Scores
Coding92
Reasoning94
Creativity72
Speed90
Cost Efficiency86
Context: 200K tokens
API: $1.1 / $4.4 per 1M tokens
Key Differences
| Aspect | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Veltrix Score | 90/100 | 88/100 |
| Context Window | 1000K tokens | 200K tokens |
| API Cost (input/output per 1M) | $3 / $15 | $1.1 / $4.4 |
| Coding | 92/100 | 92/100 |
| Reasoning | 93/100 | 94/100 |
| Speed | 88/100 | 90/100 |
Best for — Claude Sonnet 4.6
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Creative writing
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Best for — o4-mini
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o4-mini are both popular choices in the llm space. With Veltrix Scores of 90 and 88 respectively, they are closely matched overall.
In coding benchmarks, o4-mini takes the lead. For reasoning tasks, o4-mini performs stronger. For cost-conscious developers, o4-mini offers better value per token.
This comparison is generated from live Veltrix ranking data. Scores are updated multiple times per week as new benchmarks and user data become available.
Need help choosing the right tools?
Get a free AI-powered audit of your website, or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tool updates and recommendations.