Llama 4 Maverick vs o3-mini
Which is better in 2026?
Llama 4 Maverick
90
Veltrix Score
vs
o3-mini
84
Veltrix Score
Detailed Scores
Llama 4 Maverick — Scores
Coding88
Reasoning92
Creativity85
Speed75
Cost Efficiency99
Context: 1049K tokens
API: $0 / $0 per 1M tokens
o3-mini — Scores
Coding90
Reasoning92
Creativity71
Speed82
Cost Efficiency79
Context: 200K tokens
API: $1.1 / $4.4 per 1M tokens
Key Differences
| Aspect | Llama 4 Maverick | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Veltrix Score | 90/100 | 84/100 |
| Context Window | 1049K tokens | 200K tokens |
| API Cost (input/output per 1M) | $0 / $0 | $1.1 / $4.4 |
| Coding | 88/100 | 90/100 |
| Reasoning | 92/100 | 92/100 |
| Speed | 75/100 | 82/100 |
Best for — Llama 4 Maverick
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Creative writing
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Best for — o3-mini
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Fast response times
Analysis
Llama 4 Maverick and o3-mini are both popular choices in the llm space. Llama 4 Maverick currently leads with a Veltrix Score of 90 compared to 84 for o3-mini.
In coding benchmarks, o3-mini takes the lead. For reasoning tasks, o3-mini performs stronger.
This comparison is generated from live Veltrix ranking data. Scores are updated multiple times per week as new benchmarks and user data become available.
Need help choosing the right tools?
Get a free AI-powered audit of your website, or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tool updates and recommendations.