Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.3 70B
Which is better in 2026?
Llama 4 Scout
88
Veltrix Score
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
86
Veltrix Score
Detailed Scores
Llama 4 Scout — Scores
Coding84
Reasoning88
Creativity80
Speed82
Cost Efficiency99
Context: 10000K tokens
API: $0 / $0 per 1M tokens
Llama 3.3 70B — Scores
Coding82
Reasoning83
Creativity80
Speed88
Cost Efficiency97
Context: 128K tokens
API: $0.23 / $0.4 per 1M tokens
Key Differences
| Aspect | Llama 4 Scout | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Veltrix Score | 88/100 | 86/100 |
| Context Window | 10000K tokens | 128K tokens |
| API Cost (input/output per 1M) | $0 / $0 | $0.23 / $0.4 |
| Coding | 84/100 | 82/100 |
| Reasoning | 88/100 | 83/100 |
| Speed | 82/100 | 88/100 |
Best for — Llama 4 Scout
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Creative writing
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Best for — Llama 3.3 70B
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Creative writing
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Analysis
Llama 4 Scout and Llama 3.3 70B are both popular choices in the llm space. With Veltrix Scores of 88 and 86 respectively, they are closely matched overall.
In coding benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout takes the lead. For reasoning tasks, Llama 4 Scout performs stronger.
This comparison is generated from live Veltrix ranking data. Scores are updated multiple times per week as new benchmarks and user data become available.
Need help choosing the right tools?
Get a free AI-powered audit of your website, or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tool updates and recommendations.