o4-mini vs Claude Opus 4.6
Which is better in 2026?
o4-mini
88
Veltrix Score
vs
Claude Opus 4.6
85
Veltrix Score
Detailed Scores
o4-mini — Scores
Coding92
Reasoning94
Creativity72
Speed90
Cost Efficiency86
Context: 200K tokens
API: $1.1 / $4.4 per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 — Scores
Coding95
Reasoning97
Creativity96
Speed71
Cost Efficiency61
Context: 1000K tokens
API: $5 / $25 per 1M tokens
Key Differences
| Aspect | o4-mini | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Veltrix Score | 88/100 | 85/100 |
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 1000K tokens |
| API Cost (input/output per 1M) | $1.1 / $4.4 | $5 / $25 |
| Coding | 92/100 | 95/100 |
| Reasoning | 94/100 | 97/100 |
| Speed | 90/100 | 71/100 |
Best for — o4-mini
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Best for — Claude Opus 4.6
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Creative writing
Analysis
o4-mini and Claude Opus 4.6 are both popular choices in the llm space. With Veltrix Scores of 88 and 85 respectively, they are closely matched overall.
In coding benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 takes the lead. For reasoning tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 performs stronger. For cost-conscious developers, o4-mini offers better value per token.
This comparison is generated from live Veltrix ranking data. Scores are updated multiple times per week as new benchmarks and user data become available.
Need help choosing the right tools?
Get a free AI-powered audit of your website, or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tool updates and recommendations.